EddieJayonCrypto
29 Aug 25
**Trump’s Tariffs Face Legal Setback as Appeals Court Rules They’re Illegal** A major blow to President Donald Trump’s trade policy has landed in a federal appeals court, which ruled that most of his global tariffs are unlawful. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, in a 7-4 decision...
**Trump’s Tariffs Face Legal Setback as Appeals Court Rules They’re Illegal** A major blow to President Donald Trump’s trade policy has landed in a federal appeals court, which ruled that most of his global tariffs are unlawful. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, in a 7-4 decision, declared that Trump overstepped his authority by using the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose sweeping tariffs on imports from nearly every country. The ruling hinges on a constitutional argument: the power to levy tariffs, the court emphasized, is a “core Congressional power” reserved exclusively for lawmakers. Trump’s administration had argued that IEEPA granted him broad discretion to impose tariffs to address national emergencies, such as the trafficking of fentanyl into the U.S. But the court disagreed, stating that the tariffs—both those targeting specific countries and the so-called “reciprocal” tariffs applied globally—were “unbounded in scope, amount, and duration.” The decision pauses until October 14, giving the Trump administration time to seek a Supreme Court review. Trump immediately criticized the ruling as “Highly Partisan” and warned that overturning the tariffs would “literally destroy the United States of America.” His legal team, however, insists the tariffs remain in effect and vows a “victory” in the courts. This isn’t the first legal hurdle for Trump’s tariffs. In May, a federal trade court struck down similar tariffs, including those on China, Mexico, and Canada, under the same IEEPA argument. The current ruling marks the second consecutive loss in the high-stakes case, *V.O.S. Selections v. Trump*, which consolidated lawsuits from 12 states and five small businesses challenging the tariffs. The legal showdown has exposed a deeper tension between executive power and legislative authority. While Trump’s team frames the tariffs as a necessary tool to combat trade imbalances and drug trafficking, critics argue they’ve imposed steep costs on American consumers and businesses. The court’s skepticism of IEEPA’s use in this case suggests a growing judicial pushback against expansive executive actions. As the legal battle escalates, the outcome could reshape how future presidents wield emergency powers. For now, the tariffs hang in the balance—another chapter in a turbulent chapter of Trump’s presidency.